Page 4 - 樂善堂梁銶琚學校(校刊2019)
P. 4

Editorial












                Finland Overview






                 Our trip to Finland and our visits to schools clearly made a very strong impression on all those
            who participated. It is always interesting to spend time in other schools and to learn how things are

            done in different systems of education. But our Finland mission gave us more than that. The Finnish
            system has such a strong and distinctive ethos and is different from its Hong Kong counterpart in
            so many ways that we were inspired to think afresh about our approach to the education of the
            students in our care.



                 These articles give a definite sense that we saw something new and different in our school
            visits and that the general impression was overwhelmingly positive. As one article puts it, ‘The
            experience truly opened our eyes and inspired us in many ways’. Phrases such as ‘… consistent

            and high quality learning …’, ‘… greater happiness and self-confidence …’, ‘… promote equality,
            trust and life-long learning …’, ‘… flexible and responsible learning …’, ‘respect for students
            and understanding of their unique needs …’ are seen in every article and they exemplify the
            participants’ upbeat and constructive response to what they saw and learned.



                 Of course, this is not to suggest that Finland’s educational system is perfect or that it would be
            appropriate for all other countries. The way in which a country educates its young is shaped by that
            country’s history, society and many other factors, and reflects the country’s values, traditions and

            requirements. Finland is a distinctive country, dissimilar in many ways to its European neighbours,
            and certainly very different from Hong Kong.


                 Geography and population alone ensure that many aspects of Finnish education would be

            impossible to implement in Hong Kong. Finland’s average population density of 17 inhabitants per
            square kilometre, one of the lowest in Europe, means that it has plenty of open space. This offers
            exciting and accessible possibilities for environmental education. Low-rise schools with a lot of
            external space around them make outside play breaks every 45 minutes entirely practical. Hong

            Kong is at the opposite end of the scale, with an average of 6,300 people per square kilometre -
            and many more in the areas where most schools are situated.


                 Some other aspects of the Finnish system might be difficult to replicate in Hong Kong. Finland’s

            relaxed, informal approach, with its strong emphasis on learning from play and self-discovery, focus
            on life skills and the relative unimportance of regular testing, is quite a contrast to our results-



     02
     02
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9